TCL’s German QLED ban puts pressure on TV brands to be more honest about QDs

-



“Some products marketed as ‘QLED’ use conventional backlight architectures (standard phosphors, optical films, diffuser plates) and rely on picture modes or software tuning to create a more saturated ‘vivid’ look,” a January whitepaper by TÜV Rheinland and QD supplier Nanosys reads. The whitepaper, “Re-defining a ‘true’ Quantum Dot Display,” also points to devices that have QD material at “trace levels, or in packaging and integration designs that limit excitation and light extraction of certain wavelengths.”

“In these cases, the display may still achieve competitive headline gamut coverage, yet the measurable optical signature of an effective QD system is absent or minimal,” the whitepaper says. “The spectrum, color, volume behavior at high luminance, chromaticity stability, and temporal response can remain similar to those of non-QD LCD solutions.”

For now, the German ruling brings needed scrutiny to “QLED” and other potentially misleading display terms.

A clear understanding of what constitutes QD displays is also essential for QD-OLED displays and will only become more important if true quantum dot electroluminescent displays ever take off. (These displays, using a backlight-free technology, are also known as QDEL or QD-LED.)

“A quantum dot display should be defined by a combination of measurable material concentration and TV performance outcomes in terms of color purity, color gamut et cetera. Ideally, in a way that is understandable by consumers,” Virey said.

TÜV Rheinland and Nanosys’ whitepaper argues that QD displays should meet certain performance requirements that go beyond color gamut: “The display must deliver the optical advantages associated with quantum dots, including spectral precision, tunability and stability, improved color accuracy behavior across luminance (not just a single 2D gamut number), and, where applicable, temporal performance under backlight modulation.”

With TV marketing remaining murky—and often misleading—digging into detailed performance reviews remains the most reliable way to gauge how a display might perform in the real world.



Source link

Latest news

Signal’s Creator Is Helping Encrypt Meta AI

Moxie Marlinspike, the privacy advocate who created the secure communication app Signal and its widely used open source...

Want an Insane Party Trick? This Rolling Case Contains an Entire Theater

The first-person perspective used in F1: The Movie, makes for thrilling home cinema, particularly up close on a...

The Men Obsessed With ‘High T’

Mark Holman was skinny and depressed when he was working a 9-to-5 job as an air quality engineering...

Apple’s ‘Just Right’ Goldilocks MacBook Is the One Most People Should Buy

The ability to connect to multiple high-resolution displays even means it can comfortably run a full workstation, so...

Android Auto’s Secret Superpower Is a Customizable Shortcut Button

Even if connecting your Android phone to your car's dashboard via Android Auto is a daily ritual for...

The Fight to Hold AI Companies Accountable for Children’s Deaths

His mother, Megan Garcia, is also a lawyer and one of the first parents to file a lawsuit...

Must read

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you